U R B A N
E N E W A L
N D
T S
M P L E M E N T A T I O N |
Protest for housing on south side Chicago. Poorhouse. Before urban renewal could be implemented, the local officials had to label the targeted areas as blighted. What consisted of a blighted area?
Kids standing in a vacant lot next to a dead dog on south side Chicago. American Memory. In 1945, a Chicago Sun-Times article offered the following depiction: "The present slum eyesore [in the path of the urban renewal project] is a mixture of dilapidated houses and two flat buildings, junk ridden backyards and vacant lots, and rows of alley shacks."63 Bronzeville's urban renewal process began this same year. To carry this project through, the city had planned to clear the slum area adjacent to the C.R.I.P.R. This project made way for the Super Highway, currently known as the Dan Ryan Expressway.64 During urban renewal, the residents displaced from the slums along State Street could find replacement housing in the newly planned housing project of Stateway Gardens. The city planned to build Stateway as the affordable alternative replacement housing required for the implementation of this project. CHA proposed to use this site for a public housing project that contained 993 apartments.65
It consisted of 1,684 units of two, three and four bedroom apartments and extends from thirty-fifth to thirty-ninth streets. Stateway Gardens provided the African-Americans in the surrounding area apartments that served the purpose that CHA set out to accomplish of affordable, decent safe and sanitary. 66 The new housing project relieved Bronzeville of some of its housing stress because it provided more options and it began to help stifle the blight.67 However, alone, the huge project of Stateway Gardens did not solve the severe housing shortage in Bronzeville.68 The CHA continued to have extremely long waiting lists and they could not build the housing fast enough to fit everyone's needs. For this reason, the next big project proposed was the Robert Taylor Homes.
In Bronzeville, local officials usually constructed high-rise buildings. High rise apartment buildings were built because of the number of people that it could hold compared to that of apartment tenements. The same area can take care of a greater number of people.70 Therefore, instead of allowing the expansion of the ghetto to grow outward, they started to build upwards. However, these buildings were more expensive to maintain. Because these high-rise buildings required elevators, there was an inevitable cost increase in maintenance.71 In order to understand the implementation of urban renewal, one must understand the limitations placed on the residents affected by this project. The local authorities restricted the residents from fully partaking in what urban renewal had to offer. For example, everyone could not move into the public housing facilities. Potential residents had to be intensely screened by CHA. This included: 1. An office interview by a social worker The urban renewal projects perpetuated segregation by encouraging division of races in its public housing. CHA's segregation rule created a sub-culture in the public housing facilities in Bronzeville that socially isolated this predominantly African-American community from the rest of Chicago.75 This isolation shied away from integrating Chicago. Through public housing, the government had the power to integrate the city. However, the local officials, instead, choose to perpetuate institutionalized discrimination to keep Chicago segregated. Initially, urban renewal seemed ideal. Families moved out of over crowded tenements and into better housing facilities. The project provided families with space and an opportunity to actually build new lives in the North. In 1953, the Chicago Sun-Times interviewed, The Grants, a young family of five from the South. The Grants' history documents problems with African-American housing in Chicago. It presented a first hand account of the climb from the over populated tenements, to lives of comfort, health and dignity.76 Before the construction of the new housing in Bronzeville brought on by urban renewal, the Grants lived in a tenement in which three families shared the space of an apartment only intended for one. For sixty-dollars, fourteen people occupied a bathroom with one toilet that was out of order most of the time. Urban renewal granted the Grants the opportunity to live in safe and clean new housing. After receiving assistance the Grants stated that, "We feel safe from fire, safe from disease-breeding filth and safe from vermin."77 The Grants obtained housing with three bedrooms, a kitchen, a living room, a dining room and a bathroom that works for only fifty-five dollars a month. Urban renewal was definitely a dream come true for many similar to the Grants.78 |
|