Schweitzer and the Quest for the Historical Jesus
Yes: Historical Jesus is important |
No: Quest is beside the point |
1. Each picture tells us something about what each group found important | 1. Jesus didn't fit the mold in his own day, so there are many pictures |
2. Historical context can shed perspective on certain features of gospel | 2. His spirit and his message transcends time |
portrayals, such as anti-Judaism or the role played by the Romans | 3. Although portrayals of him differ, his message remains consistent |
3. His human qualities make him accessible to later generations | 4. Myth transcends history and is more potent |
4. His messages are put in the mold of different disciples' expectations | 5. In a way, who he was is now irrelevant |
5. Knowing his human context does not take away from his spiritual power | 6. Even Schweitzer is creating a Jesus in his own image |
6. Historical context makes clear how revolutionary he really was | 7. The gospel writers acknowledge this by creating different portraits |
7. If his life wasn't important, then why didn't he die 2 minutes after birth? (Peter Abelard, 12th c.) | 8. Gospel writers try to picture Jesus acontextually |
8. Scholars shouldn't be limited by Christian beliefs about Jesus. | 9. His suffering and death are more important than his life |
9. The gospels thought his life was important, not just his teachings. | 10. Historical knowledge can't tell you if Jesus rose from the dead or existed from the beginning of time. |
10. So much evil has been perpetrated in his name, it would be good to know what he actually thought. | 11. mystery of who he was is central to Christianity |
11. Even Schweitzer find the historical Jesus's words important. |